Skip to content

Home / Gear Guides / Cycling helmets

Buying guide

Choosing a cycling helmet: the label, and the rule that decides.

A bike helmet's label names the standard it was tested to. Whether that is enough depends on where it is sold, where it is worn and, for racing, which body runs the event. This guide sets out each part as the bodies publish it. See also helmet standards and independent helmet tests.

Disclosure: this page has affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. How this works.

How we recommend

We recommend gear by category and use, not by brand, and do not quote prices. We may earn a commission on purchases at no cost to you.

Get training

This page explains what governing bodies, standards bodies and road authorities publish. It is not a substitute for cycle training from a qualified instructor, for a qualified bike mechanic, or for medical advice.

What a helmet can and cannot do

Nothing on this page says a helmet is certified, safe or legal anywhere. The standard on the label, the law where it is sold or worn, and a race organiser's rules decide that. The US mandatory standard itself requires every helmet label to warn that no helmet protects against all impacts, and the Virginia Tech Helmet Lab says even the best helmet cannot prevent all head injuries.

The research is consistent on direction and disputed on size. The Cochrane review by Thompson, Rivara and Thompson (1999) found helmets reduced the risk of head, brain and severe brain injury by 63 to 88 percent among cyclists who crashed. A 2023 review of meta-analyses by Büth, Barbour and Abdel-Aty concluded helmets help regardless of age, crash severity or crash type. Rune Elvik (2011, corrected 2013) argued that one earlier meta-analysis overstated the benefit through publication and time-trend bias. The helmet evidence page sets out each review. A suspected head injury needs medical care.

The standards on the label

StandardWhat our sources say
CPSC 16 CFR Part 1203The US Consumer Product Safety Commission's standard, mandatory in the US for bicycle helmets made after 10 March 1999. Impact tests on flat, hemispherical and curbstone anvils with a 300 g limit, plus stability, strap and vision tests.
EN 1078:2012+A1:2012The European standard, listed by BSI as current and "Under Review". A claimed 2025 edition with rotational tests is not confirmed.
AS/NZS 2063:2008 and 2020Two of the six standards Australia's 2024 supply standard accepts.
ASTM F1447-18Accepted under Australia's 2024 supply standard; earlier editions (F1447-93 and -94) were on the US 1995 interim list.
Snell B-90, B-95Bicycle standards of the Snell Memorial Foundation. B-95 is accepted in Australia; both are on British Columbia's list and were on the US 1995 interim list.
CAN/CSA D113.2-M89Accepted by British Columbia's regulation and on the US 1995 interim list.

EN 17950:2024 is a test method for measuring rotational movement in an impact, not a helmet standard. Escape Collective reported in February 2025 that a coming European standard built on it would make rotational testing mandatory, with thresholds and an in-force date still to be agreed.

Where a standard is required for sale

  • United States: CPSC Part 1203, as above. The CPSC says it covers headgear marketed for cyclists, including multi-purpose helmets a reasonable buyer could take to be for cycling.
  • Australia: the Consumer Goods (Bicycle Helmets) Safety Standard 2024, registered in March 2024, requires full compliance with one of six standards: AS/NZS 2063:2008, AS/NZS 2063:2020, EN 1078:2012+A1:2012, CPSC Part 1203, ASTM F1447-18 or Snell B-95. It excludes helmets for competitive downhill and BMX racing. A search summary dates the end of its 18-month transition to 21 September 2025; we could not open the regulator's page to confirm it.
  • British Columbia: B.C. Reg. 234/96 (in force 3 September 1996) lists CAN/CSA D113.2-M89, Snell B-95, B-90, B-90S, N-94, ASTM F1447-94 and ANSI Z90.4-1984.
  • Europe and the UK: national catalogues link EN 1078 to the EU Personal Protective Equipment Regulation (EU) 2016/425; we did not check the Official Journal citation.

Who must wear one

  • Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Highway Code Rule 59 advises a helmet that meets current standards, fits and is fastened. It is "should" guidance, not law.
  • United States: GHSA records no state requiring helmets for all riders; 21 states, the District of Columbia and the Northern Mariana Islands have laws for riders under a certain age (reviewed March 2024).
  • Australia: the CDC's MMWR records Victoria's law, from 1 July 1990, as the first statewide law for all cyclists. We did not collect the wearing rules of the other Australian states and territories.
  • E-bikes: California's AB 1096 (2015) requires Class 3 riders and passengers to wear a helmet meeting ASTM or CPSC standards. In Great Britain, the government's information sheet (December 2024) says an e-bike that fails the assisted pedal cycle rules is treated as a motor vehicle needing a motorcycle helmet; Northern Ireland's nidirect says a compliant e-bike needs no motorcycle helmet but highly recommends a suitable one.

Racing rules

As reproduced in the Japan Cycling Federation's copy of the UCI clarification guide (edition date unconfirmed), UCI Article 1.3.031 makes a rigid helmet compulsory in competition and official training in all disciplines except indoor cycling and BMX freestyle flatland. Each rider must wear a helmet approved to an official safety standard, unaltered and not having suffered an accident or shock. Road and track helmets may be at most 450 mm long, 300 mm wide and 210 mm high, with helmets already on the market on 1 January 2023 exempt. A "traditional" helmet must have at least three air inlets, leave the ears uncovered and have no visor; "time trial" helmets are allowed only in listed events against the clock. The UCI applied these mass-start rules from 1 January 2026 in road and cyclo-cross, and from 1 January 2027 on the track. An undated UCI statement said a helmet certification protocol would come "no earlier than 1 January 2027"; we found nothing later confirming it.

USA Cycling Policy I requires licensees to wear a fastened helmet whenever they take part in, or prepare for, an event under its permit, including club rides. It accepts the CPSC standard (or the US DOT standard), says helmets with European CEN certification may be worn only in races on the UCI calendar, and exempts riders on rollers or other stationary devices. The racing rules page has more.

Independent ratings and rotational systems

The Virginia Tech Helmet Lab, with the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, scores bicycle helmets with its STAR method: 24 impacts per helmet at 6 locations and two energies, with concussion risk worked out from linear acceleration and rotational velocity. Its page cites a July 2025 ratings update and recommends 4 or 5 star helmets. In the first ratings (IIHS, 26 June 2018), 4 of 30 adult helmets earned five stars; in the 2019 method paper by Bland and colleagues, road helmets scored better than urban ones. A rating is a lab estimate, not certification.

MIPS and other rotational-impact systems such as WaveCel are makers' technologies, and what they promise is the maker's claim; none is a regulatory standard. IIHS reported in 2018 that all four five-star helmets used MIPS, and the 2019 paper found that helmets with MIPS scored better than those without. The independent helmet tests page explains the method.

Replacing a helmet

The CPSC requires the label to say a helmet should be replaced after an impact, and the UCI rule excludes helmets that have suffered an accident or shock. We found no standards body or governing body giving a number of years after which a cycling helmet should be replaced, so we give none. Helmet fit is not described here; we suggest having it shown in person.

Our picks by category

PICK 1

Cycling helmets

For road, commuting, gravel and mountain biking. The label names the standard: CPSC Part 1203 for sale in the US, one of the six named standards in Australia, EN 1078 in Europe and the UK. For racing, a UCI event needs a traditional helmet in mass-start races (road and cyclo-cross from 2026, track from 2027), and USA Cycling accepts the CPSC (or US DOT) standard and says European CEN-certified helmets may be worn only in races on the UCI calendar. Independent STAR ratings, where a helmet has one, are published by Virginia Tech with their date. The standard and the body's rule decide whether a helmet may be sold or worn, not this guide.

Best for: Every adult rider, for every ride

PICK 2

Kids' bike helmets

For children on first bikes and in training schemes. Most of the US state and territory helmet laws GHSA lists are for riders under a certain age, which GHSA puts generally at about 16, and the CPSC standard applies to all bicycle helmets made after 10 March 1999. In NHTSA's 2024 data (published July 2026), children aged 14 and under were 5 percent of cyclists killed in US traffic crashes and 12 percent of those injured. The same label check applies as for adults.

Best for: Children and young teenagers

Sources

  1. US CPSC, bicycle helmets business guidance
  2. 16 CFR Part 1203, Safety standard for bicycle helmets (Cornell LII)
  3. Federal Register, interim bicycle helmet standards (23 March 1995)
  4. BSI, BS EN 1078:2012+A1:2012 helmets for pedal cyclists
  5. Genorma, EN 17950:2024 listing
  6. Escape Collective, will Europe's coming helmet standard make cycling safer (17 February 2025)
  7. Australia, Consumer Goods (Bicycle Helmets) Safety Standard 2024, explanatory statement (F2024L00362)
  8. British Columbia, Bicycle Safety Helmet Standards Regulation, B.C. Reg. 234/96
  9. GOV.UK, The Highway Code, rules for cyclists 59 to 82 (updated 22 October 2025)
  10. nidirect, rules for cyclists 59 to 82 (Northern Ireland)
  11. nidirect, electrically assisted pedal cycles
  12. GOV.UK, electrically assisted pedal cycles in Great Britain: information sheet (updated 10 December 2024)
  13. GHSA, bicyclist and pedestrian state laws (reviewed March 2024)
  14. CDC MMWR, Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Use, Victoria, Australia
  15. California AB 1096 (2015), enrolled bill
  16. UCI, Clarification Guide of the UCI Technical Regulation, Articles 1.3.001 to 1.3.034 (bilingual copy hosted by the Japan Cycling Federation, uploaded March 2026; edition date unverified)
  17. UCI, Management Committee measures to protect rider safety and health (22 to 24 September 2025)
  18. UCI, statement on its recent decisions regarding changes to equipment (undated)
  19. USA Cycling, Policy I (helmets)
  20. Virginia Tech Helmet Lab, bicycle helmet ratings (page citing a July 2025 ratings update)
  21. Bland, McNally, Zuby, Mueller and Rowson, Annals of Biomedical Engineering (2019)
  22. IIHS, new tests show some bike helmets protect better than others (26 June 2018)
  23. Cochrane, Thompson, Rivara and Thompson, helmets for preventing head and facial injuries in bicyclists (1999)
  24. Buth, Barbour and Abdel-Aty, Scientific Reports (26 May 2023), review of helmet meta-analyses
  25. Elvik, Accident Analysis and Prevention (2011), re-analysis of Attewell et al.
  26. TOI, Elvik corrigendum, Accident Analysis and Prevention 60 (2013)
  27. NHTSA, Traffic Safety Facts: Bicyclists and Other Cyclists, 2024 Data (DOT HS 813 822, July 2026)

Keep reading

Disclosure The Gear Sports Cycling is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Our recommendations are independent.